<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Josh McNeill &#187; minorities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joshmcneill.com/tag/minorities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joshmcneill.com</link>
	<description>Audio Engineer, Composer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans don&#8217;t want poor people to vote?</title>
		<link>http://www.joshmcneill.com/2008/09/republicans-dont-want-poor-people-to-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joshmcneill.com/2008/09/republicans-dont-want-poor-people-to-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News/Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime mortgage crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshmcneill.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/17/uselections2008.democrats My headline isn&#8217;t as one sided as it sounds. Apparently Republicans are using the foreclosure crisis to stop people from voting. If someone has been foreclosed on they want said person&#8217;s address placed on a list at the voting stations so that anyone who wants to vote and is listed as living at that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/17/uselections2008.democrats">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/17/uselections2008.democrats</a></p>
<p>My headline isn&#8217;t as one sided as it sounds. Apparently Republicans are using the foreclosure crisis to stop people from voting. If someone has been foreclosed on they want said person&#8217;s address placed on a list at the voting stations so that anyone who wants to vote and is listed as living at that address, can&#8217;t. A little fishy, eh? This is supposedly an effort to lower voter fraud, which may be true in some part, but my guess (and only a guess) is that it&#8217;s also an effort to stop black people, who according to polls and history are much more likely to vote for Obama, from voting.</p>
<p>The one face saver the Republicans have in this little dispute is the argument of responsibility. I&#8217;m not talking about being responsible enough to not be foreclosed on or earning the right to vote by making good financial decisions. I&#8217;m talking about being responsible enough to update your address on your voter registration card. You can change that address regardless of whether you own the home you&#8217;re now staying at. This is a good argument. My only counter is that some people don&#8217;t have a home after going through foreclosure. They also may have been forced to move as far as another state and only temporarily. If you have lived in location A for 30 years and 3 months before the election you&#8217;re forced to move to location B, you probably want to eventually move back to location A. Why should your vote be counted in a state that you have nothing to do with and won&#8217;t have anything to do with in the future? This is a way to redraw the electoral map although I admit this isn&#8217;t the greatest argument against saying people should be responsible enough to update their address.</p>
<p>Either way, I don&#8217;t see how this would combat fraud. Why would someone be able to vote in multiple locations just because their house is in foreclosure? Why would a foreclosed home be prone to being used by multiple people as their residence when voting? These things lead me to believe that this is just Republicans being incredibly screwed up.</p>
<p>And yes, foreclosures do affect minorities more than whites.<br />
<a href="http://www.foreclosurelistings.com/blog/foreclosure-victims/minorities-worst-affected-by-foreclosures.htm">http://www.foreclosurelistings.com/blog/foreclosure-victims/minorities-worst-affected-by-foreclosures.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joshmcneill.com/2008/09/republicans-dont-want-poor-people-to-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

