Archive for the ‘Science/Technology’ Category

Looks like I’m heading toward stupid.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Jan 07 2009

Word is that living in cities makes you stupid. Take that city dwellers! Actually it just wears out your brain according to some new studies. On the other hand, living in a city also causes innovative thinking because of the constant stream of unpredictable social interactions. It’s pretty fitting that I came across this article just as I was finally deciding to get out of a small town and head to a big city. Here it is, by the way:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/01/04/how_the_city_hurts_your_brain/

Fortunately, there are various ways to counteract the stupefying effects of city life. Essentially, just stare at some trees. That’s right, nature puts your mind back into focus, for real. This whole thing is starting to sound like some sort of hippy propaganda. Maybe it is. You never know when those sneaky little devils are trying to inject the idea of love of nature subliminally into your head. I blame Al Gore. He’s not really a hippy, but.. whatever.

Honestly, I’ll buy this argument. Hell, I’ve already decided to leave at least one of my two blinds open. Previously, they remained closed at all times. I’m paranoid, and hiding things. Not really, I think I just don’t like having to pay attention to whether I need to watch the window or not. But yeah, why not keep a tree in your periphery at all times? It’s not hard to do. Even taking a walk through a natural area once in a while isn’t a big chore, especially when it has real results for your well-being.

Microsoft resurrects Y2K via Zune.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Jan 01 2009

Yesterday I got in my car to go to work and plugged in my Zune to find it frozen. Not frozen as in cold, even though it could have been but the software was frozen. I chalked this up to the thing possibly being broken and figured I’d take a look at it later when I had more time. I vaguely remember hearing about someone else’s Zune also having problems somewhere in that day. This morning I get up and I check out the videos on the front page of Google and find one that’s referring to all 30GB Zunes, the model I have, crashing. I watch that and then search the news for Zune and sure enough, every 30GB Zune out there has crashed because Microsoft didn’t program the software to be able to handle leap years.

Awesome, eh? I guess the idea was the none of these Zunes, as this is a two year old version, were going to last long enough to make it to a leap year anyway. Apparently, they didn’t foresee bad sales that left retailers with stock of this model even after the next year’s model came out. That’s right, many of us are using a two year old model that was only purchased one year ago. You can see how Microsoft tries to spin this into a good thing:

Early this morning we were alerted by our customers that there was a widespread issue affecting our 2006 model Zune 30-GB devices (a large number of which are still actively being used)

http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/music/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212700344&cid=iwhome_art_Digit_mostpop

You see that? This is a good thing because it shows how many people are still using a model that they’ve owned for two years! These things hold up great, don’t they?

When it comes down to it, this is simply a matter of incompetence. I was planning on my next MP3 player also being a Zune, maybe one that I could fit my whole library on, but if they could screw up something as simple as this, which comes after having horrible issues with their music management software, I’m not too sure I want to go that route. You want to know what their magically solution was? Let your battery die and wait until after a certain hour on January 1st to plug it back in and all will be well. Gee, that’s swell. Good thing I didn’t want to listen to anything on my player on New Year’s Eve.

Botox? Why not just get a new face?

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Dec 17 2008

In all seriousness, this story has strong ethical implications.

http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=1f3c75d5-4ef6-4cb0-9f33-4d3edf16d47e

A woman, who is being kept anonymous, has received a face transplant in Cleveland. This procedure has been done three other times but not in the United States and not to such a great extent (80% of her face is from a cadaver). The operation took twenty two hours and the team of experts that were involved in the procedure sound confident that it was a success. They still have to wait for swelling to go down to really know, but there’s a great deal of optimism about it.

The patient was chosen from a body of candidates who were put through all sorts of tests both psychological and physical. The drugs she has to take, for the rest of her life, will weaken her immune system so that her body doesn’t reject the face but the side effect is losing up to ten years off her life.

Mostly, I’m interested in the psychological and ethical implications of such a procedure. For one, when this person looks into the mirror they’re going to look like a human being that has died. There have been experiments recently where people are taken out of their body, psychologically, using virtual reality devices, and placed into the body of someone else and the impact is drastic. For instance, racists were placed into the body of someone from the race they hated and it was very convincing for those people. For a bit, they actually believe that they are that other person. Think of what this means for this woman when she looks into the mirror and someone else stares back at her.

The ethical questions are also numerous. What about the family of the donor? Their dead relative is practically walking around in a different life and I don’t mean heaven. What if these people met? What happens if people start entering into this procedure just because they want to look different? Is there anything wrong with that? After all, plastic surgery is an accepted reality anymore. This could be a new extension of that idea. Along with genetic engineering, we’re getting closer and closer to being able to literally make ourselves into whatever we want. For my part, I’m going to try and remain optimistic. Maybe looks will be unimportant once everyone is beautiful.

The universe as a pogo stick.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Dec 14 2008

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026861.500-did-our-cosmos-exist-before-the-big-bang.html?page=1

It appears, if I understand this article, that the big bang may not be exactly what we thought it was. Some crazy smart theoretical physicists came up with this testable theory called loop quantum cosmology (LQC) which seems to be saying that the universe just explodes and contracts repeatedly. Basically the universe would have no start or end. I’m going to try and explain what this thing looks like from my limited understanding but someone smarter than me should really come along and correct whatever parts I get wrong.

Picture a point that’s the size of a proton. That’s the universe in its contracted state. Once it gets to that point it bursts out like a spring that you can’t hold closed any longer. After expanding for a while it reaches it’s maximum size and starts to pull back with enough force to eventually reach the size of a proton again.

Apparently this is a much different view of the universe from what scientists have thought for a while. Also, this is testable and gives some hard evidence for a lot of other important ideas that have remained educated guesses.

Honestly, most of this is just a million miles over my head. I think I get the gist of it but the fascinating part to me is the fact that we’re still making big breakthroughs in understanding our universe. I get the impression that this is almost equivalent to Einstein’s formulation of general relativity.

The world is unfolding. I think that’s neat.

Magnets on the brain.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Oct 24 2008

The FDA just gave the go ahead for doctors to use magnets to tickle your brain cells when you’re depressed. Apparently someone out there has been messing with something they call transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The idea is to take magnets and use them to stimulate parts of the brain responsible for things like mood regulation. There have been studies that showed that this was effective for a lot of people suffering from clinical depression and, of course, there are no side effects. The downside to these studies is that the placebo groups didn’t get a very convincing dose of fake therapy. Obviously, if you’re comparing two groups and neither of them can be used a control then your results aren’t going to be all that acceptable. It’s interesting anyway. It makes you wonder how long it will be until we no longer have to be sad, ever. It also makes you wonder if that’s really a good thing. Check it out:

http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/dn14998-magnetic-brain-therapy-gets-us-green-light.html

Collective consciousness anyone?

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Oct 07 2008

I was pleasantly surprised by a video game today. I usually follow PC gaming so I know what’s coming out and all but the game that caught my attention tonight was a Playstation 3 title called Little Big Planet. The developers bring a novel idea that, to me, speaks to the perpetually greater amount of connectivity that technology is bringing to our world.

First of all, the game looks fun. It’s a side scrolling platform game. The catch is that it’s a pseudo-sandbox setup. You make your own levels and play other people’s levels. Essentially you can make whatever you want. Seriously, it’s extremely open ended to the point where one person has built a working calculator in the beta version of the game. The things you build can also be shared online with other players. You get ratings, friends, comments, etc. They seem to have tied social networking into their video game.

If this all works out, I think this will be a big step towards showing the real power of video games. There are so many positives here. They give people an outlet for creativity and creative thinking instead of being confined to a linear path. They give people the opportunity to spread that expression of themselves around the world instantly and even get noticed if they’re aspiring game producers. They give people a chance to learn through the game as essentially anything is possible (see calculator). I feel like I’m forgetting a bunch of things that I was thinking about earlier but you get the picture. Extrapolate.

Anyway, seeing is believing. Here it is:

This is why I’m smarter than you.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Oct 05 2008

I don’t think that I could say that with a straight face in real life. I know I’m not stupid, but I’ll often argue against the things I think I know if I can’t find someone to do it for me. I’m pretty much in a constant state of questioning whether I’m right or not on any number of points so I couldn’t possibly be arrogant enough to tell anyone that I’m smarter than them…. unless someone out there thinks that’s a completely inaccurate portrait of me.

Anyway, I found this article today:

http://www.physorg.com/news142185056.html

Supporting what many of us who are not musically talented have often felt, new research reveals that trained musicians really do think differently than the rest of us. Vanderbilt University psychologists have found that professionally trained musicians more effectively use a creative technique called divergent thinking, and also use both the left and the right sides of their frontal cortex more heavily than the average person.

I think this study is pretty much a load of crap personally. First of all, I know you don’t need millions of people to make a psychological study statistically significant but forty people? Also, the musicians had higher IQ as a whole? Doesn’t that mean that they picked people who had higher IQs for the musicians side of the experiment? These people failed the chicken vs the egg test. And the last thing I’ll point out, although not the last thing that could be pointed out, is that I’ve met a hell of a lot of really stupid musicians. Maybe classical musicians from this one particular school tend to be smart, but that’s certainly not the whole from my experience.

<Insert closing paragraph that creatively wraps things up here.>

Another new super computer.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Sep 27 2008

I found this today in my RSS reader:

http://eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210602671

Most of the article is probably gibberish to anyone who’s reading this but there are two important points. One is the idea of separating applications from the server. The other is the processing power of this system compared to the processing power of the human brain.

If I understand what they’re saying correctly, they plan on allowing applications, even while they’re running, to be re-allocated to different parts of the network in real time. This is a pretty significant leap in stability. To simplify, if a computer that is currently running the program you’re using crashes then the program would automatically be run by a separate computer without interruption. You would essentially never see this system crash unless the entire system went down simultaneously. This can probably tie into the cloud computing idea that I posted about before. Cloud computing could use this technology and so be much more stable than computers, as we know them today, are. You could even tie this into the economy. Network and system outages can be a big drain on business. I know every time the computer system is down where I work we lose customers simply because we can’t solve each problem quick enough by hand.

The other idea is probably a bit more exciting to those who aren’t interested in technology. This system would be able to perform 1000 petaflops which would be the first computer system, that I’m aware of, that beats out the processing power of the human brain. In a nutshell this means we’re one step closer to being able to create artificial intelligence that matches human intelligence. Obviously the system would have to be shrunk down for widespread practical applications and we would still have to figure out how to program the AI but it’s a definite step forward. Maybe in the next couple decades we’ll have to seriously start answering ethical questions about artificial intelligence.

I’m regularly amazed at how much the human race is accomplishing. It’s fun to watch the world change on a daily basis and gives a good argument for optimism (or pessimism too if you’re afraid of change I guess).

LHC spin off?

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Sep 11 2008

That thing I was talking about the other day, the Large Hadron Collider, may have its own spin-off technology. The amount of information created and collected by this machine is up in the petrabyte level (millions of gigabytes). There was no way for the project to use the internet as a backbone for moving all this information between the 55,000 servers they’re using so they developed a new, completely fiber optic system. This network is about 10,000 times faster than current broadband connections. That, from the viewpoint of computing today, is essentially an unlimited amount of bandwidth. What this means is that cloud computing, along with a complete disregard for bandwidth limitations when developing new technologies, could be on the horizon.

The idea behind cloud computing, if I understand it right, is that your computer would be a gateway instead of the workhorse behind your computer use. Your computer’s power would not be limited by what pieces of hardware you have in front of you. Instead, most things would be saved on various computer on the grid and you would just be accessing it all from your computer. You would also be using the processing power from all these other computers. That’s the big thing. Whatever processing power all the other computers on the network aren’t currently using could be picked up and used by your computer. So, all those people who have brand new laptops that they use purely for browsing the web, yeah that won’t be a waste of computing power. The power users who may be playing high end games, running graphic design programs, editing movies, etc, will not have to worry about running out of power. If you build a 3D object in a CAD program that’s really complicated, it might take 3 seconds to render it instead of 5 weeks.

If you think about it, this might also lead to even more independent media being produced on the same level as commercial media without those independent people needing to spend thousands and thousands of dollars. Do you know why Pixar movies look way better than the 3D videos you’ll find on YouTube? Because they have the processing power to render them. Imagine if anyone who wanted to could create their own Pixar movie without even having to consider the hardware limitations. Neat stuff.

I’ve been reading the Hunchback of Notre Dame. There’s a chapter in that about how the printing press destroyed buildings. What Mr. Hugo was referring to was the art of architecture. He makes the argument, which may or may not be correct, that before the printing press the most widespread form of the common person’s expression was architecture. People could fancy up their homes and it would be seen by every person that walked by. It was much more expensive for them to write a book and have it copied by hand and only the nobility really had access to those books afterwards because they were so expensive. With the printing press, that suddenly flipped. Writing books was a much cheaper way to express yourself and your ideas could be picked up by more people than those who just happen to walk by your house. The internet has done the same thing to every other form of media. Movies, music, graphic arts, fine arts, are all instantly cheaper to create and easier to spread. The ability to shape our culture is being placed in the hands of the people like never before and things like this grid system can only progress that pattern. I don’t know about the rest of you but that gets me excited.

You can read a bit about the technology here:
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/09/06/they-say-my-machine-threatens-the-world-91466-21685078/

BTW, just to tie some political spin into this. John McCain doesn’t even use the internet. How can you trust a guy who hasn’t even used the internet yet to be able to react to how these new technologies are changing our world?

The end of the world… again.

Science/Technology | Posted by Josh
Sep 08 2008

On Wednesday, September 10th, CERN will be turning on their Large Hadron Collider and possibly create a black hole that sucks up our entire planet from the inside.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/08/particlephysics.physics

If we don’t get sucked into a black hole, this collider is expected to bring us a giant leap closer to developing a “theory of everything”. Sooo, the risk is erasing all human life along with any evidence that we ever existed at all and the reward could be as significant as finding God. Fun stuff, eh?

The risk of a black hole is supposed to be ridiculously miniscule. It’s supposed to be as likely as watching a pen fall through a solid table. There are some 8,000 physicists working on this thing so we can only assume that all of those optimistic opinions are correct. Afterall, we’ve had this situation before. When the first atoms were split in a little room in Chicago, the scientists working on that project didn’t know whether they would ignite the atmosphere or not. No worries, right? I guess you have to ask yourself though, if the chance of ending all life is .000001%, is that still too high?

The problem is, if this is our last two days in existence, we should all probably live it up, right? I mean, there are plenty of things that I can think of doing and saying to people that I would never, ever do if I thought I had to live with them for the rest of my life. Come to think of it, shouldn’t we just live that way anyway though? Do you live your life as if there’s only a couple days left? For all we know nuclear war could break out tomorrow or we could be wiped out by some act of God. Personally, I still feel reluctant. Pride and embarrassment are possibly the worst features of the human psyche.

The world probably won’t end in two days and you probably won’t have to tell all the people you know that you love them or do all the things that you were too embarrassed to do before. You won’t have to admit your undying love to your secret crush and you won’t have to spill your darkest secret to your family. You won’t have to decide which religion is right all the sudden or ask for forgiveness before you bite the big one. You can go on living your life exactly like you’ve been doing if you want. At the end of the day, even if the world isn’t going to end, is it really worth living that way?

Switch to our mobile site